Did Humans Evolve from Dinosaurs?

“Mommy where did I come from?”  This is a familiar question of young children.  Now imagine hearing this answer given by a parent. “Well, we all came from dinosaurs a very, very long time ago.” This is not so far-fetched. There is a real possibility that we may have descended from dinosaurs, or more properly, had a common ancestor with a type of dinosaur called Fabrosaurus.

Fabrosaurus or “Fabre’s Lizard” is named after Jean Henri Fabre, a French entomologist.  This dinosaur is believed to be a small, 3-foot tall plant eater. An incomplete lower right jaw of this dinosaur was found in South Africa in Triassic sediments.  (ref. pg. 143 The New Illustrated Dinosaur Dictionary by Helen Roney Sattler, copyrighted 1983 & 1990. Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Books. New York, NY.)

I can hear your complaints now. “Oh! Mr. Black, you have gone too far.  We all know that humans had an ape like ancestor.  What do you mean by making such an outrageous statement?  You need proof and lots of research to back up a statement like that. You just must not make such a claim.”

You know, if I read a claim like mine written by someone else, I would think the same thing.  It is just that, my research has given me a different understanding of the ancient past and human evolution as-well-as.

So, just how do I reach this conclusion?  Well, it’s actually a guess and not a conclusion or theory in a scientific sense. However, it is based on some evidence, controversial evidence I agree, but evidence never-the-less.

This evidence is the 2012 release of artifacts by the Mexican Government depicting cone-headed individuals.  Furthermore, these artifacts also have engravings of what seem to be  cone-headed beings undertaking interplanetary space flight.  I told you the evidence was controversial.

Let us continue.  The engraved images also show hands that look like those of a Fabrosaurus (Ibid pg. 159).  You may think that this evidence is thin in the extreme, well it is.  I admit this. It is just that my research indicates that a highly developed civilization existed on Earth upwards of 864 million years ago.  So, what kind of beings could have existed that far back in the past?  In fact, dinosaurs are too recent and a pre-dinosaur ancestor is required as an ancestor to the human line.

This is not all. The issue with dinosaurs is that they are considered to be either reptiles or warm blooded  bird like animals.  Even so, there is a problem.  Human have “live births” and do not lay eggs.  So, where is the connection to dinosaurs or other such ancestor?  The answer is in two parts.  First, is the ICA stones.  They are a highly controversial artifacts, claimed to be hoaxed. Second, the Brachiosaurus a very massive plant eater.  Why this particular dinosaur?  The answer is that the ICA stones have engraved images of the Brachiosaurus having live births and nursing their young like modern cows do today.  They seem to be mammals or pre-mammals. Since humans had to come from something, some type of dinosaur or pre-dinosaur animal had to be the source.  So, as they say in the United States, “the hits just keep coming”.

Advertisements

Theia and the Origin of the Moon and Earth’s Extinct Debris Field

Sometimes an idea is so distant from our current understanding that it seems fantasy and not fact.  Coupled to this a lack of mathematical understanding and the new idea is even more impenetrable.  Even so, the new idea or hypothesis can be correct.   So, how can we judge if it is correct or not?  Let us consider new scientific research and see if the new idea or hypothesis fits.

The new research we can consider is the new hypothesis on the origin of the moon. This research is called the Big Splat of Lunar Origin.  Briefly, it proposes that a planetary body the size of Mars struck the earth at a glancing angle resulting in both a massive debris field and the moon.  The impactor is called Theia.

Why is this important?  Well, we have claimed that we have discovered an orbital path about the earth of either a lost moon or a debris field.  We use this path together with plate tectonic movement to date lost civilizations.  Well, the test we have to make is to determine how can there have been an orbital debris field or moon in the Earth’s past and what mechanism could have caused it.  Or, in other words, is our hypothesis of an orbital path possible?  The answer is yes because the impact with Theia supplies the mechanism that resulted in the formation of such a debris field.

Furthermore, the strange orbital path we have hypothesized is consistent with Theia’s impact.  We believe that the Earth was struck in the Northern Hemisphere at the latitude and longitude of the Great Lakes.

So, our hypothesis, found independently of any reference to the Big Splat Theory, is not rejected by current scientific research.  In fact, it agrees with it, strongly arguing that our work is scientifically sound. If we were incorrect, we would not have this correlation to this lunar impact theory.

The unfathomable aspect of our work exists simply because most people were schooled at a time when this new scientific work had not be done or was not included in their curriculum.  This is another support for our work and demonstrates that it is not only possible but new and unique as-well.

The Blythe Intaglios, America’s Nazca lines, could be 50,000 Years Old!

Guess what? We may have found the answers to some of the questions about the Blythe Intaglios (incised designs) discovered by US Army Air Corp pilot George A. Palmer in 1931. (See philipcoppens.com for a full discussion)

What are these intaglios?  They are large geoglyphs in the desert floor outside Blythe, California in the United States that are best seen from the air. One, the giant, is very large – 167 feet long.

In addition to questions about their large size and how they were made, there are questions as to why were they place so that they can be best viewed only from the sky, why were they made to begin with, and why were they located in the desert of Blythe, California in the United States. We believe that we have discovered the answer to some of these questions.

The Blythe Intaglios were place under the path of flight of an orbital celestial object of earth that no longer exists.  The celestial object could have been either a massive debris field or moon or even some combination of both.  A debris field can coalesce into a moon or a moon can break apart into a debris field by action of the earth’s gravity.  The exact nature of this celestial object is not yet known but this author believes that it was most likely a massive debris field made up of very large blocks of rock.

Well, the orbit of this celestial anomaly, passes over the Blythe Intaglios.  In fact, one can extend the orbit to include the Meteor Crater in Arizona.  This crater was caused by an impact 50,000 years ago.  The orbit also extends northeast toward the Great Lakes where it turns southeast toward Africa.  We discovered this orbit accidently back in the summer of 2009 and have used it as a reference line in conjunction with the plate tectonic movement of the continents to date various archaeological sites. (See our book: Secrets of Lost Earth.)

It is known that the ancients worshipped celestial objects and we believe that this object was also an object of worship.  It also acted as a celestial reference point for locating places on the ground i.e. for fishing, hunting, etc.

Given the location of these Intaglios in the desert outside Blythe, we believe that they could date from the time of the Meteor Crater impact some 50,000 years ago. Dating these intaglios is very difficult.  Dates of from 900 years to 2,000 years ago have be suggested but not confirmed.

Lake Mills, Wisconsin and the Extreme Antiquity of North American Sites

In the United States there are many strange and anomalous sites and artifacts and, in fact, such things are spread far and wide over the entire North American Continent.

One such site is Rock Lake in Lake Mills, Wisconsin in the United States.  Under the water of this lake there is claimed to be stone constructions left behind by an ancient civilization.

Although mainline archaeologists and anthropologists dismiss this claim, there is the very real possibility that a very ancient civilization may have existed there – possibly many millions of years ago.

This possibility is supported by the geographic location of this site, the use of plate tectonic movement to analyze it, and the current understanding of the origin of the Earth’s moon.

In short, there is a scientific basis for this possibility even though a great deal of research still needs to be done to be certain of the age and physical reality of each site.

What I’ve done is study the very ancient past with the use of plate tectonic theory (the movement of the continents). This method has allowed me to date an ancient civilization in Mexico to over 100 million old.  Yes! I wrote over 100 million years old.

The location of Lake Mills, Wisconsin (43° 4’ 48” N & 88° 54’ 33” W) indicates a possible age of this site dating back about 55 million years.  This is only a guess but the presence of a dinosaur bone may make it even older.

In order to date with plate tectonic movement it is necessary to have a reference point.  That reference point is a line drawn on the map of the earth that indicates the path of an orbital object or objects.

This path passes over the United States just north of Lake Michigan and then turns southwest toward Arizona and the Pacific Ocean.  This orbital path traveled over Lake Mills about 55 million years ago.

What is the cause of this orbital path?  Well, the current theory of the formation of the moon is that a Mars size object impacted the earth over four billion years ago and its debris formed the moon.  Also, a massive debris field formed that orbited the earth, as well.

This debris field, like other celestial objects became an object of worship for the ancients.  It could have been interpreted as a stairway, as a snake coiled around the earth, or even a pathway to reach heaven.  The ancients did not use our current scientific jargon to describe it.

Since the rate of movement of any geographic point away from this reference orbit is known, the measured distance becomes a measure of the time at which the site was under this path.

By using these techniques, I was able to confirm the dating of the impact that killed the dinosaurs and discover that the meteorite that struck the earth originated from this orbital path.  Also, it became obvious that an ancient civilization existed in Mexico from 103 to 65 million years ago.

Furthermore, some kind of civilized or semi-civilized society, most likely not human, existed across all of North America.

The current academic establishment does not accept the existence any kind of intelligent beings other than modern humans.  Additionally, they accept that humans are relatively recent and not more than 200,000 or so years old.

Ages of the kind that I propose are considered too extreme and academics even refuse to examine my research objectively.  How is this science?

Was the Old Man in the Mountain an over 800 Million Year Artifact?

The Old Man in the Mountain is the name of rock feature that existed in the Franconia Notch State Park in the State of New Hampshire in the United States of America.  It is called the Old Man because a profile view of it looks like the head of a man.  It has always been considered a natural phenomenon and never considered artificial. It collapsed a few years ago due to erosion.  Its coordinates are 44.1607 degrees North Latitude and 71.6830 degrees West Longitude.

Given this, then, why do I ask if this feature is an 800 million year old artifact?  The answer is simple.  It could very well have been an 800 million old artifact from a long lost civilization that existed on our world.

No, I am not joking nor am I delusional.  My work over the years has established a body or research that indicates that our world was inhabited by an ancient civilization during the time of the extinct super continent of Rodinia.  Rodinia became extinct over 750 million years ago.   Furthermore, this hypothesis, if correct, would undercut all current understanding about the origin of intelligent life and civilization on Earth.

Let us consider a few issues for the moment.  First, the current understanding about the origin of human beings is that we are 200,000 years old with some of our previous ancestors upwards of four million years old.  Furthermore, intelligence and civilization are considered to be the exclusive traits of modern human beings.

Well, if this is so, then why is there the real possibility that the Sphinx of Egypt may be 800, 000 years old?  Yes, this date for the Sphinx is possible because it displays signs of a type of water erosion called ‘wave cut hollows” created by standing surface water.  This means that the Sphinx was at one time totally submerged and that could not have occurred in Egypt more recently that 800,000 years ago. (Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect Of The Problem Of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R.I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia).

The issue with the Sphinx is that the Archaeologists and Geologists disagree on its age. Of course, if a modern human population re-occupied a land once inhabited by a more ancient civilization, then, this disagreement can be explained.

But, one may wonder, how do we get such an extreme old date of over 800 million years?  And if such a date is correct, why hasn’t the scientific community discovered it.  The reason is that the scientific community was neither looking for something this old, nor looking in the location of Rodinia.  Why should they? Rodinia wasn’t theorized until the early 1990s after geoscientists constructed paleo-cartographic maps of it. These maps demonstrate that New Hampshire would have been in Rodinia over 800 million years ago.  This means that the Old Man in the Mountain could date from this time.

Even so, what is more unexpected is that our whole scientific understanding of the origin of life and civilization may be very incorrect. Why is this?  With the extinction of Rodinia the Earth suffered an extreme ice age.  It was so extreme that the entire globe was covered with glaciers that were three miles high, even in the oceans, for 120 million years.

This 120 million year freeze would have frozen various life forms in ice until the ice melted and deposited the dead animals on the land where they then could have become fossils.  This means that there is a systematic error in scientific dating of the oldest fossils of at least 175 million years.  By the way, this Ice Age is called “Snow Ball Earth”.

Now what evidence do I have that such a civilization once did exist? Well, there are various kinds of evidence but the ones I wish to mention are the engraved statues released by the Mexican Government in 2012.  These carvings depict cone headed individuals with large slanted eyes combined with images of interplanetary space flight, the planet Saturn, and an image of the Earth with the supercontinent Rodinia.  In spite of various objections, it is not possible to hoax scientific truth.  It is not possible to draw an image of either Rodinia or Saturn unless one has some kind of direct knowledge of them.

There is an additional comment that I wish to make about dating.  Some time ago, I came across various discussions about a pyramid in the State of Alaska. I do not know if such a pyramid exists.  But if it did, I wanted to date it through the use of plate tectonics, the movement of the continental plates.

This is how I proceeded. I just simply assumed why and where the ancients located this pyramid and calculated how many years would have passed for this location to move to its current position.  Two separate calculations gave me the dates of 825 and 864 million years ago. These dates would correspond to the time of Rodinia.

By the way, I am not playing fast and loose with the data.  What I did is done often in scientific and engineering research and is a “what if analysis”.  The location I used would be, today, the latitude and longitude of the northern point of Lake Michigan, part of the Great Lakes region of the United States.

At this point I what to make reference to Dr. John Brandenburg.  He is the author of Death on Mars a book that demonstrates that Mars is the home of an extinct civilization that he believes was destroyed by two massive nuclear explosions 500 million years ago.  It is my opinion that his research supports my work because it demonstrates an extremely old civilization on Mars that could have traveled to Earth although he does not make this claim.

As for the Old Man in the Mountain, well it may or may not have been an over 800 million year old artifact but maybe, just maybe it is.

Archaeological Error and the Extreme Antiquity of Civilization.

Almost two weeks ago I was interviewed by a radio talk show.  They wanted to know why my research conclusions are correct and main line scientific work is dubious.  At the time, I answered that the science and was on my side.  Now, after thinking about this for a little while, I added some more detail to my response to help people understand my reasoning.

Let us consider the Sphinx in Egypt.  Egyptian scholars claim that this construction is 4,500 years old.  However, it displays evidence of extreme water erosion.  How do you get water erosion in arid Egypt? The Sphinx had to have been built at a time when water was plentiful in Egypt.  Furthermore, the Sphinx exhibits a specialized kind of water erosion called wave cut hollows.  This adds a special consideration.

Wave cut hollows are formed by standing water moving by tidal action.  They cause “c” shaped cuts in rocks at water level.  The Sphinx exhibits wave cut hollows from top to bottom indicating that it was at one time totally submerged.  Now, when did this happen?  Date estimates for this is 800,000 years ago. Archaeology and Egyptian scholars have refused to accept any geological analysis with regard to the dating of the Sphinx.  Just what kind of “real science” is this? We have to questions the conclusions of both Archaeology and Egyptology.

Here are two examples from Mexico.  One is El Pillar, the lost and buried city of the Maya in the Yucatan. This site is totally buried but with the use of a special radar technique, archaeologists were able to discover an ancient temple buried underground.  However, this temple, which is supposed to be dedicated to the Sun is oriented facing the Northeast and not due East.  Archaeology cannot explain this but my research does.

If we apply plate tectonic movement, we can rotate the North American plate backwards in time to the point where the temple faces due east and determine the date of the temple.  That date becomes 66 million years ago!  Furthermore, we can explain the burial because the impact that killed the dinosaurs struck the Yucatan and created a very large tidal wave that inundated all of Mexico and parts of the United States with water and silt from the Gulf of Mexico.  We now have a very elegant explanation for El Pillar and evidence for an ancient civilization dating to the time of the dinosaurs.

We can take another example from Mexico and by using plate tectonics explain another mystery.  This one is the lost city of Monte Alban in Southwest Mexico.  This city rests on a mountain top 6,400 feet high.  Some of the more controversial writers on this subject believe that ET came to our planet and cut off the mountain’s top and built the city.  No, this didn’t happen.

What actually happened is that Monte Alban was built when the Southwest tip of Mexico was a level peninsula. Over an extremely long time, the North American plate rotated in a counter clock-wise direction and through the gradual subduction of another land mass the site of Monte Alban was elevated 6,400 feet.  We can set the date of this lost city to about 95 million years ago.  In fact, I’ve dated the Olmec site of La Venta to over 103 million years.

My research using plate tectonic movement demonstrates that there was a civilization in Mexico over 100 million years ago that was destroyed 66 million years ago by the meteorite that killed the dinosaurs.

Now think, whom are you to believe, Archaeologists, or the Geologists?  My pick would be the geologists.  Given this, now we have to question and DOUBT the methodology of Archaeology in all circumstances because, as a discipline, it has failed to correct its errors in dating. Archaeology, as a disciple of study, has decided to continue to use its flawed methodology in its research.

Would you like to attend a lecture by Mr. Black?

Would you like to attend a lecture presentation by Mr. Black?

Mr. Black is planning a presentation tour to promote his new book that will be published later this year.   If you or people you know would like to attend his lecture and meet him just email him at: black2tell@yahoo.com .  Mr. Black will make  the effort to visit as many locations as possible.  Although current plans call for a North American tour he will consider a trip to the UK if there is enough interest.