Scotland’s Vitrified Walled Hill Forts

Do you want to know something that will drive Archaeologists crazy? They will complain that I don’t know what I am talking about; that my claims are pseudo-science; or that I am simply incorrect.  If you are curious read on.

The vitrified walled hill forts of Scotland may be 66 million years old and constructed by intelligent non-humans. If fact, my approach to the mystery of walled hill forts may be far superior to any archaeological solution primarily because it is more direct and simpler than any they have offered.

Let us examine the issue and progress from there. What are these forts? They are hill top constructions in both Scotland and Europe. They total about 200 forts of which 60 are in Scotland. The walls were assembled dry without mortar and then the vitrified. Vitrification requires temperatures of 1100 degrees centigrade and turns the rocks into glass. Some of the walls were vitrified on the inside and some on the outside.

Now why would anyone want to do this? Aside from the fact that the vitrification process weakens the wall why vitrify some of the forts on the inside and others on the outside? There seems to be little logic in this. We will have more to say about this later in this essay but now let us consider some of the current knowledge about these forts.

In the period of from 1934 to 1937 two archaeologists Wallace Thorneycroft and Vere Gordon Child conducted an experiment by burning lumber next to stone blocks and discovered that the rocks vitrified.

Additionally, radio carbon dating was conducted on bog soot and timbers establishing a date in the 1st millennium BC, the time that iron smelting began in Great Britain. This means that the inhabitants at this time had the means and know how to generate temperatures high enough (1100 degrees centigrade) to turn rocks into glass (vitrification).

So, the current thinking about these forts is that they are all 1st millennium constructions and their walls were either part of the construction or destruction  (war) of the forts themselves. All that is necessary is to learn who were responsible and why they vitrified these forts.

Well, to properly answer any mystery it is necessary to have both a sufficient and necessary condition. The answer has to be completely necessary and also completely sufficient to answer the question of the mystery. The British Iron Age does not meet this standard.

Just because the inhabitants had the ability to vitrify rock walls doesn’t mean they did. Neither does it tell us why it was done and why some forts had their walls vitrified in the inside and some on the outside.

Furthermore, radio carbon dating is inadequate for two reasons. First, it does not date beyond 50,000 years thereby giving a false early date and second, it dates by context and does not date the wall itself. Anyone at any time could have come upon these forts and started a fire at a more recent date. Context dating is really no dating at all.

Now, for my approach.  If we consider Scotland at the time of the end of the Cretaceous Period some 65 to 66 million years ago, we find that its geographic location is much closer to North America. Since the European plate moves in a Northeasterly direction Scotland and all of Europe would have been both west and south of their location today. In fact, they would have been under the trajectory of the meteorite that struck the Yucatan and killed the dinosaurs.

The process of entering the atmosphere of this 6.5 mile wide rock from space would have generated a very bright flash and intense heat that would have started forest fires world-wide. In fact, the heat would be hot enough to vitrify rock. It would be almost like an atomic bomb blast with intense heat and light.

This also explains why some of the fort walls were vitrified on the inside and some on the outside. The reason is that their geographic location would have exposed the walls differently to the meteorite that killed the dinosaurs.

This approach provides both a sufficient and necessary conditions to explain what happened. All the forts were vitrified in the remote ancient past by an intense flash and heat as the meteorite passed into the Earth’s atmosphere while it traveled to an impact point at the Yucatan Peninsula in what is now Mexico.

Now, my detractors will claim that there was no intelligent life alive at the end of the Cretaceous to build the forts. Well, the issue here is that the forts, themselves, provide the proof of the existence of intelligence life on  the Earth during the Cretaceous. Keep in mind that human beings have a collar bone a featured already traced back over 90 million years. So, it is possible for a pre-human to have existed.

As for the meteorite’s trajectory, my own research has provided me with a projection of the orbit of a celestial object that was the Earth’s debris ring. This ring traveled along an orbital arc with its closest approach at what is now Sault Saint Marie on the US and Canadian border north of Lake Michigan. This debris field then turned southwest and traveled all the way to what is today Tahiti in the Pacific Ocean where it turned around again and traveled Northwest back to its northern turn around point.

Using this orbital path I discovered that it flew over the Chicxulub Crater on the Yucatan coast. It also flew over Chichen Itza and Tulum, two lost ruins of Mexico, indicating that they were deliberately constructed under this debris field’s orbit. This also is evidence of intelligent life during the Cretaceous.

What we have now is both a better approach to solving the mystery of these forts and evidence for the existence of intelligence life on the Earth at the time of the dinosaurs.

However, I expect that my work will be bitterly attacked by traditional scholars because it challenges the very foundation of their academic disciplines.

Authors Note:    Since publishing this post I have been able to view maps of Europe at the time of the death of the dinosaurs, KT boundary.  Scotland was an island and was aligned with the extreme Southeastern part of Sweden. They both were pointed in a direct line toward the Yucatan Peninsula in what is now Mexico. Therefore, it seems that the meteorite that struck the Earth ending the Cretaceous Period entered the atmosphere somewhere near Southeastern Sweden and flew over Scotland on its way to the Yucatan.

Advertisements

America’s Dinosaur Era Civilization

In the former “X-Files” TV series agent Mulder had a poster that stated that “The Truth is Out There”.  Well, it is but no one wants to believe it. Why, because they have been raised on the current false scientific theories of the ancient past that make the truth impossible to accept.

Maybe we should substitute the word reality for truth because what we are facing is the need to change modern science’s understanding of the reality of the ancient past. Another way to look at this is to simply state that modern science must change its view of the real ancient world. It must accept the ancient world on its terms instead of imposing a false view of it through erroneous scientific assumptions and analysis.

This error is a direct result of funded professional research that puts careers ahead of scientific truth. The academics know what I am talking about and they hide in their tightly knit jargon infested disciplines and don’t move too far astray of the accepted theories for fear of loss of their funding and careers.

Real scientific truth comes with breaking the mold and reaching beyond the accepted. Unfortunately, those who do pay a very high price for this but provide great scientific strides, often not realized until after their deaths.

In spite of this, I, as an independent researcher and thinker, have attempted to do this by applying continental movement to the dating of the very remote ancient past and have had some success in this effort.

As a result, I’ve discovered that the Earth has harbored intelligent life and civilization in the extreme ancient past going back hundreds of millions  of years. Such a notion is so extreme to the modern scientific myths taught in our colleges and universities as to make anyone pursuing this path of research appear to have lost their grip on reality when the exact opposite is correct.

Well, enough of my complaints about our current academic scientific community. Let us move on.

My work has discovered that the ancient sites of Mexico are ancient in the extreme. What we have is the remains of a Cretaceous Era Civilization that was destroyed 66 million years ago by an impact from space. This impact occurred on the coast of the Yucatan and is believed to have destroyed the dinosaurs.

The issue here is that this Cretaceous Era Civilization extended into what is now the United States, particularly, the American Southwest and certain areas of the Southeast. This extended civilization is the topic of this essay.

For those of you interested in my dating of the ancient cities of Mexico I refer you to my various articles on this blog dealing with these cities. However, I will review a few issues to support my claims for a Cretaceous Era Civilization. Here they are.

Since it is not possible to date rock, scholars can’t determine when a piece of rock was quarried and used to build a building.  Therefore, they resort to dating by context. This usually entails finding some organic object and dating that object, usually via Carbon-14, and then using that date for the date of construction.

Look! Not only does carbon-14 dating not generally provide an age beyond 50,000 years but the use of another object ignores the fact that individuals other than the builders could have arrived at the site many years after its construction. I have to make a special note here, in that carbon-14 can in certain cases date as far back as 72,000 years but even that provides a date that assumes intelligent civilization to more recent times than I believe it to be.

This is what was done on Easter Island.  The stone heads could not be dated directly so researchers dated a camp fire to the first century BC resulting in an age for the stone heads of 2,000 years. Just how can this be science? It is very possible that the Easter Island heads are very much older than 2,000 years and our academics have no way of knowing their true age. Similar techniques have been used at archaeological sites all over the globe.

Another issue is misidentified and ignored research. I will give one example here. William Niven discovered a buried city some thirty one feet below the surface in the Valley of Mexico about 25 miles from Mexico City.  That city has not be studied and his work was ignored.

The issue here is that the underground city was destroyed by a massive earthquake followed by burial in a massive tidal wave. Just how could this site have been submerged by a tidal wave since it lies some 7,000 feet above sea level and is surrounded by mountains 5,000 feet high? The destruction would have had to occurred millions of years ago.

What about the Acambaro figurines? These artifacts were discovered in 1944 and show what look like humans, or human like beings, together with dinosaurs. Furthermore, the dinosaurs are accurately depicted. How could this be unless they original images were made by individuals that had direct knowledge of dinosaurs?

My dating of various sites in Mexico indicates an age over 100 million years. Tulum and Chichen Itza are dated to 66 million years ago. Teotihuacan is dated at over 70 million years ago. Monte Alban is dated to 85 million years ago  and La Venta is dated to over 103 million years ago. These dates are based on the movement of the North American Continental Plate.

This is not all. There are a number of unexplained and mysterious artifacts, sites, geographical land forms, and even mythology that support the claim for an American Dinosaur Era Civilization. I will mention just a few.

In the American Southwest, at a place called Monument Valley, located in the states of Arizona and Utah, there exist five high rise buttes that exhibit evidence of being carved by an advanced civilization some 35 million years ago.

In the American State of Wisconsin, underwater in a lake in the town of Lake Mills, there is claimed to exist stone constructions left behind by an ancient civilization. My date for this site is 55 millions years ago but it could be very much older.

There is also the mysterious rock wall in the town of Rockwall, Texas.  This town is about 10 miles east of Dallas, Texas.  The mysterious wall has be claimed to be upwards of 50 million years old but a dispute rages over its origins. Is the wall either a natural or artificial object?

Even the North American Navajo folklore of the Goddess, Spider Woman, is descended from mythology from Mexico’s Teotihuacan. This myth is ancient beyond belief.

Although academics may question the use of this evidence, it still build a case for an extremely old civilization, centering on the Cretaceous, for a civilization in Mexico and extending into the United States.

May I suggest that you, the reader, read through this blog and discover what academics refuse to consider. It will be worth your time to do so.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Humans are a Hybrid Species

Why do people have feet and hands? No! This is not a ridiculous question.  Its answer will lead us to the truth of human origins.

Think about this for a moment. Humans are supposed to have evolved from apes but apes do not have feet like we do. Ape feet are more like hands. If we really evolved from apes then we humans should have hands for feet. Why do we not have ape like hands instead of feet?

A couple years ago I published an essay that discussed an Israeli find of an Egyptian sarcophagus that showed a human face with feet like hands. The hands had no thumbs. Humans must have thumbs. My readers dismissed my observation but I was correct and mainline science seems to have intentionally ignored this find. Why? Because it demonstrates that all their theories about human evolution are incorrect.

This Israeli find indicates that in the ancient past beings similar to humans, but not human, did indeed exist. They were intelligent beings like us but they were not us.

“OH No! Mr. Black you can’t say that. You are making a leap that is unjustified.” I can hear my detractors now but they are totally wrong.

To prove something you need to have a necessary and sufficient condition. It is required in mathematics and in logic.  Well, where are the necessary and sufficient conditions to prove that humans evolved from apes?

Fossils and DNA analysis don’t qualify.  They don’t explain why humans have hands and feet and apes do not. Nor do they explain the Israeli find .  They do not provide necessary and sufficient conditions to explain this human characteristic.

Yes, the proper DNA is necessary for humans to develop hands and feet but how did the required DNA form. Science has not proven nor adequately explained human origins.

Let me tell you a story.  About a month ago I caught a rat in a trap.  What I noticed was that the rat’s feet looked like hands. I had never noticed this before and this experience set me to thinking.  If the current theories of evolution are true then we humans should not have feet like we do.

Furthermore, if we evolved from an animal that had feet instead of hands then our hands would look like feet. They don’t. So, how do we explain this? The only possible explanation is that humans are a type of combined species, or hybrid, between two different species.  It is almost like some ancient ET created us in a laboratory.

Therefore, we must conclude that humans are hybrids.  This explanation provides the necessary and sufficient conditions to explain human origins. OK! So, where is the evidence? Good question. Here is the answer.

The evidence has either been misidentified or rejected. I believe both are true. The evidence is also highly controversial and very limited.  If academic scholars were to seriously consider this evidence they would put their careers at risk.  You see, professional science doesn’t want the truth because it may interfere with careers and academic funding.

Let us consider some of the evidence. How about the ICA Stones?  I told you it would be controversial. The ICA Stones illustrate human like individuals together with dinosaurs only the dinosaurs appear to be small, about human size.

To an academic, this evidence can not be accepted.  It has to be fake because everybody knows dinosaurs became extinct 65 or 66 million years ago.

Well, I never wrote that humans go back 65 or 66 million years ago.  I did write that “human like” individuals are illustrated with dinosaurs on the ICA Stones. If we closely examine the “human like” individuals it becomes obvious that they are not human like we are. They must be some kind of other species.

Oh! The date of 65 or 66 million years ago is not indicated on the ICA Stones.  Since the dinosaurs are small, human size, that indicates a date of 86 million years ago because dinosaurs did not grow to their large size until after that time.

The Acambro figurines found in Mexico are additional evidence. One of those figurines depict a large “monkey god” standing upright with horns on its head. This animal has feet that look like ape hands. There is no animal like this alive today and it is not an ape or monkey but a “monkey like” being. To the best of my knowledge there are no fossils or DNA of this animal.

Now, if we examine the art of Easter Island, we come across an image of an ICA Stone “human like” female having sex with a “monkey like” being. Is this proof? No, it is not but it gives us a clue of what to look for and what may have happened in human evolution.

Now science tells us that inter species reproduction produces sterile offspring. Maybe this was not the case in the very ancient past.  No one knows for certain what happened in the very ancient past.  However, we still have a viable hypothesis that human beings are a hybrid species.  How this occurred is not known but it seems to have happened.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earth’s 5.75 Million Year Old People

Have you ever found something by accident? You know, you are just going about your normal activities and then , “there it is”, the unexpected find. Well, that has happened to me.

You see, my normal activities deal with finding unexplained mysteries and ancient civilizations. In the process I look over various internet stories and combined them with my own theories. This methodology sometimes results in unexpected discoveries, or at least surprises, that simply amaze me.

They also make people doubt my work. However, the finds are real and offer answers to questions that have never been asked. Here is my latest example.

In my post “Crete’s 5.7 Million Year Old Footprints” I discussed the discovery of fossilized human footprints in Crete dated at 5.7 million years of age. Well, the post previous to that, “Did the TWA/United Airlines Crash of 1956 Occur Over a 5.75 Million Year Old ET Site?”, seems to confirm the dating of the Crete discoveries and extends them to the United States.

What?! That was exactly what I thought. The two posts are totally unconnected. At least that was what I, at first, believed.

The issue is that the airline crash was unconnected but not the date of an ancient find in the American Grand Canyon. Let us briefly re-examine the matter.

In the airline post about a TWA and United Airline Crash in 1956, I stated that the aircraft crashed in an area that was restricted and contained an ancient, “alien” site.

I have never been to the crash site and have no direct knowledge of the “alien” site. For me, it may or may not exist. I was only attempting to date this possible “alien” site in the event it did exist using my method of plate tectonic dating. It was, for me, just an exercise.

Well, I published a date of 5 million years on my blog post. Actually, the date was 5.75 million years. This is the unexpected find and I have now updated my blog post.

You see, the date of 5.75 million years is very close to a date of 5.7 million years for the footprints found in Crete. So, my method is providing dates similar to dates used by other scientific methods. It demonstrates that my work is consistent with current academic science and is correct.

Some of you may believe that what I found is just a coincidence. That may be. However, I say that what is behind this coincidence is the fact that people, of some kind, existed at this date in the past and that they existed in both North America and Europe at such an ancient date.

This challenges our understanding of not only human origins but of our whole understanding of evolution as well.

Crete’s 5.7 Million Year Old Human Footprints.

The island of Crete harbors fossilized human footprints dated to 5.7 million years ago. This was reported in the Heritage Daily on September 4, 2017. The chief researcher and author of the study is Professor Per Ahlbeg of Uppsala University.                                          (See http://www.heritagedaily.com)

This research challenges all the current theories of human origin. No longer are we strapped with the “Out of Africa” theory of human origins. Neither are we forced to accepted the young age of 200,000 years for humanity. The great antiquity of intelligent life has been established. It may not be established to a billions years but a 5.7 million year date smashes the currently accepted false academic theory.

Before this discovery we were stuck with the 3.7 million year old Laetoli footprints in Tanzania. They showed upright walking with human like feet and indicated a “hominin” (early human lineage) that originated in Africa but remained isolated for a million years.

The Laetoli footprints belong to Australopithecus and have feet similar to humans but a narrower heal and no proper arch. The Crete fossils from the Trachilos area are unmistakenly human.

The Crete footprints come from a time when the Mediterranean was dried out and northern Africa was covered by savannah-like environment and not the Sahara Desert.

The Trachilos fossils come from a period called the late Miocene.

There is also another hominin called Graecopithecus found in Greece and Bulgaria that is known only from fossils of its teeth and jaw. This is dated to 7.2 million years ago.

These recent discoveries demonstrate that scientific knowledge constantly changes and is not absolute. This is something that academics must always be reminded of. Their theories are only good until the next discovery overturns them.

Did the TWA/United Airline Crash of 1956 Occur over a 5.75 Million Year Old ET Site?

I recently came across the fact that there occurred an airliner crash in the United States over the Grand Canyon. This crash involved two aircraft. One was a TWA Constellation and the other a United Airlines DC 7. The date was June 30, 1956. Some 100 persons were killed.

What is so intriguing about this airliner disaster was not the crash itself, but where it occurred. More specifically, where the aircraft landed in the canyon and that access to this location is restricted.

The reason given for the restricted access is that the crash site is in proximity to an ancient inhabited site that is both extremely old, perhaps millions of years, and it’s now extinct inhabitants have a similar appearance to inhabitants of ancient Egypt. There are some folks who believe that this site was the formerly occupied by Extraterrestrials.

Well, I am not certain about any of these claims except the one about the airline crash itself. That is real and did occur. However, in spite of my uncertainties about this particular crash site, I considered it relative to my own work. What I discovered was both surprising and expected.

You see, my work has established the prior existence of a debris field or ring around the Earth. Since the ancients worshiped the stars and planets it seemed plausible that this debris field would also have been worshiped and that these ancients would have established temples, monuments, and possibly even cities under this debris field.

So, I examined the site’s geographic location and discovered that it is about 90 miles Northwest of Winslow, Arizona in America’s southwest. Winslow is near the location of Meteor Crater, the site that was struck by a meteorite some 50,000 years ago. The coordinates for this location are 36 degrees 10 minutes North Latitude and 111 degrees 50 minutes West Longitude.

Well, “here we go again” I thought to myself. If this Grand Canyon crash site does contain some kind of ancient archaeological site, then, it would have been directly under the orbit of this lost debris field.

Since Meteor Crater has been dated at 50,000 years of age the Grand Canyon site, because of its distance would have to be far older. Exactly how much older I have not, as of yet, attempted to calculate but a estimate of 5.75 million years would not be out of order.

The United States, as with all of North America, contains many mysteries. This is just one of them.

Did Spider Woman, the Navajo Goddess, Really Exist?

Surprising isn’t it? Could a religious myth of American Navajo peoples actually refer to an actual physical goddess? The answer is most certainly yes.

If you are at all familiar with my work you know that I have attempted to explain the unexplained and discover what does not exist today but did exist in the past. As a result I have been able to discover the existence of intelligent civilized life on our planet many millions of years ago.

I accomplished this by discovering the orbit of an ancient debris field that orbited the Earth and then used the projection of this orbit as a reference line to date various archaeological sites by the use of continental plate movement.

The method is simple. Just locate any geographical point and calculate when in the past under the orbit of this lost debris field.

Actually, this is the way the ancients could develop a calendar. Since the Earth wobbles in its orbit celestial objects travel over different points on the surface during the course of a year returning to their starting point. This marks both the beginning and ending of a cycle or year.

Well, in the United States, the native Navajo people live in the Canyon De Chelly National Monument in Northern Arizona. This location is home to a very massive and tall sandstone rock called Spider Rock.

According to Navajo folklore the goddess called Spider Woman, the protector of the Navajo peoples lived on the top of this 800 foot tall rock.

Given the location of this Spider Rock, as it is called, the former orbital celestial debris field would pass over this rock marking the beginning and ending period of the calendar.

The reference to Spider Woman is what the ancient debris field looked like to the ancient peoples of the American Southwest. Keep in mind that we are talking about a debris field and depending where on the Earth’s surface you view it from it could be described differently, for example, a snake, a spider, a stairway to heaven, even a ring.

Here, in the Western hemisphere, we find several of these descriptive names for this same debris field. Another is a snake. In fact, in the State of Ohio, we have a native American site called Serpent Mound that depicts a large open mouth snake. I believe this to also be a reference to this same debris field.

Where did this debris come from? Current scientific thinking believes that the Earth was impacted by a Mars sized object the ejected material of which formed the Moon and also this debris field.

So, Spider Woman was real. She was the Navajo name for this debris field which I believed fell to the Earth at the end of the last Ice Age, about 12,000 years ago.