Mr. Black: A Scientific Heretic of the First Order.

A few days ago, I spoke with an old friend who told me that she had looked over my blog and didn’t “follow it”.  She couldn’t understand what I was getting at and how I discovered the great antiquity of intelligent life on the Earth.   Well, I decided to write this little essay to help others who may have the same difficulty.

One of the basic “truths” that I have discovered is that one cannot hoax true science.  I know that so-called scholars will argue with me here but what I have said is true.  One cannot hoax true science.  What does this mean?  It means that when one comes across an unusual artifact with unknown history of ownership or discovery that the artifact can still be tested by examining the science depicted on the artifact.  Even if the artifact has been copied and re-copied, the science can be examined.  Well, examining the science depicted on various artifacts gives us a very different understanding of our planet’s past and the true history of civilization.  Both intelligent life and civilization are far older than anyone could have even imagined, upwards of one billion years old.

Furthermore, the recent scientific discoveries of the last 50 years neither exclude nor render impossible this claim.  They do the exact opposite and both allow and support the reality of this claim.  In short, intelligent-life, both human and non-human, has existed for a very long time on planet Earth.

Just how did we go about making this discovery?  We began by looking for impact craters on earth and plotting them on a map.  We also applied mathematics. We divided the map of the globe into sectors and averaged the location of the impact craters to discover an “average” or “mean” position for the impacts. This allowed us to plot a line around the world that represented an orbital path of a celestial object around our planet.  We, at first, believed that this object was a lost moon of earth – and it still could be – but a better explanation is that it represented the debris field of an impact of earth by a Mars sized object over 4.1 billion years ago.  In fact, the orbital path matches the impact trajectory and orbital direction of our moon.  This conforms to the “Big Splat Theory” of lunar formation.

Given this orbital path, we applied Plate Tectonics, the movement of the continents, by using this path as a reference line and were able to date various archaeological sites.  This resulted in the finding of extremely old dates for civilization.  We got a date of 28.5 million years for ancient Egypt and upwards of 103 million years for an ancient civilization in Mexico.  The current dating of Mexico’s lost cities represents the date that these sites were occupied by modern humans and not their original builders.

Given the old dates we calculated, we were able to make sense out of the images engraved on various artifacts.  These artifacts showed us images of intelligent beings that were “human like” but not “human” as we are.  One specific characteristic of the ancients was that they did not have thumbs.  This meant that they were not anthropoids (apes) and therefore could not be human.  All of this is clearly displayed on various artifacts but is not openly discussed in archaeological circles.

This result also explains the possibility of extra-planetary civilizations, particularly on Mars.  It seems that the ancients were capable of interplanetary space flight at the time of their destruction by some ancient calamity. Dr. John Brandenburg has written that he has discovered evidence of a nuclear explosion on Mars that destroyed the planet.  He bases this on the discovery of Xenon 129, an isotope produce in nuclear explosions. He also dates the destruction of Mars back to 180 million years ago.

However, our work indicates that intelligent life resided on the Earth at the time of the super continent of Rodinia. This super continent became extinct 750 million years ago and brings our work into direct conflict with established paleontology, specifically on the dating of when life spread across the surface of the earth.  Paleontology dates the spread of life on the surface of the earth to 542 million years ago but we deem it to be very much earlier, over one billion years, with intelligent life and civilization between 864-825 million years ago.  This also seems to be the date that the ancients travel to the planets.

We fully realize that what we are claiming is controversial in the extreme but it is not absurd. These claims are made based upon our examination and study of the data we have been able to consider and they are not excluded by recent finds.  However, currently established academic disciplines including archaeology, Egyptology, Mayan studies, paleontology, philology, and paleo-anthropology (human origins) have much to reconsider and correct.  This makes us a scientific heretic of the first order.

OOPs, Scientific Truth, and the Difficulty of Studying the Very Ancient Past

Euler, the 18th century mathematician, stated that two variables that are equal to a third variable are equal to each other.  He said that this was self-evident.  In other words, this is a universal or absolute truth of mathematics.  Like philosophy, mathematics deals with absolute truth. However, this is not the case for science.  Remember, you cannot go from “bottom-up” but only “top-down” to properly explain nature.  In short, a workable theory needs to be developed and supported by observation and experiment to provide us with scientific truth.  Scientific truth is neither dogmatic nor absolute.  It is only probable and subject to change with new information.  Unfortunately, the bias of mainline science will resist any change.

Here is another example.  Alfred Wagoner developed a theory that continents move and called it “Continental Drift”.  Mainline science, particularly in the United States highly criticized Wagoner for his work.  What happened?  In 1968, with the discovery of sea floor spreading, geologists accepted the theory of plate tectonics, the movement of continents.

Now, let us consider OOP fossils and artifacts. What are OOPs? They are “out of place” artifacts and fossils, inexplicable finds that cannot be explained and were often found by non-professional scientists.  This is often the reason they are ignored and dismissed, often as fakes, by mainline science.  There are many objects that can be called OOPs but even considering their non-professional discoveries they can still provide data that can help us unravel and explain the past.  They should not be dismissed out of hand.

One archaeological artifact that is not considered an OOP is the Egyptian Sphinx.  I believe it to be an OOP because Geologists and Egyptologists do not agree on its age, an age disparity upwards of 800,000 years. The great age of intelligent life on earth has been demonstrated by this OOP. Furthermore, this great age also challenges the belief that only modern humans were capable of civilization.

How do we come to this conclusion? So called experts in Egyptology date it as 4500 years old.  Dr. Robert Schoch (PhD geology) sees it as being at least 5,000 to 7,000 years old.  In a conference in the late 1990s geologists agreed with him while the Egyptology accepted the younger date.  Furthermore, additional research conducted by two scientists from the Ukraine discovered that the Sphinx was at one time totally submerged and as the water level dropped left “wave-cut hollows on the Sphinx.  This could have only happened at the earliest, 800,000 years ago.  (Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect of the Problem of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R. I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia.)

Frankly, it seems to me that all traditionalist or mainline researchers just don’t know how to really interpret and understand their research results.  All truth is self- evident but that assumes that the researcher is not closed minded or blinded by mainline scientific bias. The refusal of mainline researchers to even study so called OOPs demonstrates their bias. Also, their refusal to even consider the possibility of non-human intelligent life possessing civilization further demonstrate their bias. How can anyone look for non-human intelligence in the Earth’s ancient past if they begin by not even accepting the possibility that they may have existed?  You cannot find what you are not looking for.

Here is another discovery I have come across through my research.  Mexico was the home of a civilization upwards of 100 million years ago. This civilization came to an end 66 million years ago with the impact that killed the dinosaurs.  This can be easily determined by considering the movement of the North American Plate. The easy way is to keep in mind that the ancients worshiped the sun so their temples must face east.  Well, the geographical location of the various cities and temples in the Yucatan face east when the North American plate is re-positioned to where it was 66 million years ago.  Furthermore, much of the Mexican lost civilization was covered under a massive layer of soil.  Since it would take more effort to bury their ancient cities that build them, it is obvious (self-evident) that their burial resulted from the massive tidal wave resulting from the impact that killed the dinosaurs 66 million years ago.

This analysis makes all the lost cities of Mexico OOPs.

Archaeological research in either Egypt or Mexico, or anywhere else for that matter cannot be considered as rigorously scientific because of the built-in bias of their disciplines and refusal to accept geological dating of which Dr. Robert Schoch’s work on the Sphinx is an example. The Sphinx is not irrelevant to the study of any OOP.  It is the exception that proves the rule.

Furthermore, some of the methods of archaeological dating are very problematic. One reason is that one cannot date when a stone or rock structure was built.  What is generally done is some other item is found and dated with Carbon 14 testing. Carbon 14 cannot date beyond 50,000 years.

Now, in the case of Mexico, it is possible to test my conclusions. Just rotate a map of the North American plate backward in time to 66 million years ago and you will find that the temples, cities, and streets of the Maya face east as they should if they were built by a society that worshiped the sun.

Plate tectonic movement is the only way to study and date very ancient sites. Tectonic movement provides dates that make sense and explains other research.  For example, the Maya seem to have similarity with ancient Egypt and other ancient civilizations, possibly predating these other civilizations.  Well, my work using plate tectonic movement, dates a civilization in Egypt and the Azores to 28.5 million years and a civilization in Mexico to from 103 to 66 million years. So, yes this ancient civilization in Mexico could have seeded other ancient civilizations.

Furthermore, if we examine the Mayan cities, we find them all buried. In fact, there are Mayan, and Olmec, and other ruins in Mexico still underground.  It doesn’t make sense that the ancients buried these places themselves.  However, an impact by the meteor that killed the dinosaurs would explain that because of the tidal wave produced.

These ancients were not modern people.  They were both similar and dissimilar to us but they were not us.

Let me make a suggestion.  Don’t just accept the mainline scientific research.  Some of it is good but some of it is not.  Remember that academics have many other considerations than pure science. Their careers and funding issues are examples and they tend to color research. Also, many PhD researchers tend to be overly specialized.  This also colors their work.

The Dorchester Pot: A 600 Million Year Old Artifact

If it looks like a dog, and acts like a dog, then it is must not be a dog.  Does this make sense?  Of course not because it would be illogical to come to this conclusion.  Well, this is just how mainline academics, particularly archaeologists, come to their conclusions about a famous mysterious artifact called “the Dorchester Pot”.

What is this artifact?  It is a metal vase-like object that was discovered in 1852 at the Meeting House in Dorchester near Boston in the United States. The Dorchester Pot was found in two pieces after the explosion and measures 4.5 inches high, 6.5 inches in diameter at its base and 2.5 inches in diameter at the top. The object was reported in both a local paper, the Boston Transcript and in the June 5, 1852 issue of Scientific America.

The object was blasted out of pudding stone (Conglomerate) that is part of the Roxbury Conglomerate 15 feet below the surface.  The Roxbury is estimated to have formed 593 to 570 million years ago.

However, archaeologists cannot accept this possibility that this artifact is this old so they reject it “out of hand”.  No one wishes to heed the work of unorthodox researchers and face up to the amazing implications of this discovery.  That is, that there existed in North America an advanced civilization, one with the ability to work metals.

Well, what is the “truth” about this object? The archaeologists Keith Fitzpatrick- Matthews and James Doeser on their “Bad Archaeology” website view this object as a Victorian styled candlestick.  Italian debunker Biagio Catalano views as nearly identical in decorations and shape to an Asiatic Indian pipe holder in Munbai.

Michael Cremo, a nonorthodox researcher, believes this artifact to be evidence of ancient metal workers in North America over 600 million years ago.

So, who is correct? How do we decide?  Mainline academics just cannot accept the extreme age of the artifact.  Let’s face it.  If they do then they have to alter all their theories and re-write their archaeology books.

Is there a way we can find a solution?  Yes!  You see that the Mexican Government released photos of artifacts found in Mexico.  These photos we made public in 2012 after being kept secret for 80 years.  What we notice after looking closely at the artifacts is that they indicate a civilization at the time of the supercontinent of Rodina, between 900 to 750 million years ago.

This changes everything. It means that a date of 600 million years for the “Dorchester Pot” is possible. It also means that mainline academic understanding of evolution and the origin of people is seriously flawed.

Our research, written elsewhere on this blog supports this extreme date for civilization on Earth and the very real possibility that this “Dorchester Pot” is upwards of 600 million years old.

New Planet Proves Planets Change Orbits

The recent discovery by two Caltech researchers (Yahoo News 1/21/2016) of the possible existence of another planet in our solar system beyond Pluto supports my research. Mike Brown and Konstantin Baytgin computer simulations indicate the very real possibility of another planet 56 million miles away from the sun that completes an orbit every 20,000 years. This planet may have altered the orbits of either Saturn or Jupiter, or for that matter the orbit of any other planet.  This supports our research that the solar system was different in the very ancient past and led to the destruction of life on Earth and/or the other planets.

Briefly, their work with mathematical modeling and computer simulations indicate that a planet 10 times the size of Earth would have altered the orbits of the other planets in earlier times of the solar system and could, itself, been knocked out of orbit by the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn. (See their paper “Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System”)

The current theory among solar system scientists is that at its origin the solar system had four planet cores, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune but it could have easily had five cores.  The interaction between these planetary bodies would have altered the planets’ orbits and knocked this new one out of orbit and into the Kuiper Belt which is home to a very large number of ice bodies and asteroids.

Why is this important?  It is important because from inspection of artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 there is evidence of an ancient Earth civilization that had space flight and memorialized a trip to Saturn.  Jupiter was nowhere indicated.

This civilization existed on planet Earth at the time of the supercontinent of Rodinia.  Rodinia formed from 1100 to 900 million years ago and was destroyed 750 million years ago.  This leads us to conclude that intelligent life may have existed on Earth upwards of one billion years ago.  The current discovery of this new planet supports our work and does not contradict it.  If we were incorrect then new science would contradict our work and prove us wrong. Since this new science does not contradict us then we must be on the right track and are closer to the truth then even we first believed.

This is the sixth new scientific discovery that allows our research and supports our conclusions.  The other include: plate tectonics, the reconstruction of supercontinents, the impact that killed the dinosaurs, the “Big Splat” theory of the formation of the moon, and “Snowball Earth”.

Earth did indeed harbor intelligent life at a very early time, possibly one billion years ago. Our work and the new scientific discoveries we have just mentioned make this abundantly clear.

The Guadeloupe Woman: Is it a 15th century or 28 Million Year Old Skeleton?

In 1810 the British seized the French Island of Guadeloupe and sent a large stone slab back to England containing a skeleton of a headless and footless woman.  This particular skeleton has become the object of controversy regarding the age of the skeleton and the Creation debate.  We will discuss this skeleton and add to this debate.

We came across this oddity when reading the website Bad Archaelogy.wordpress.com written by Keith Fitzpatrick Matthews, an English archaeologist.  Frankly, his precision and attention to specific detail regarding the skeleton was refreshing even though it demonstrated a traditional and narrow perspective.  We understand that science must be rigorous. We also understand that it is necessary for science to disprove various theories in order to get to an accurate and truthful assessment of any object, artefact, or skeleton.  However, narrowness and rigid adherence to traditional methodologies do not guarantee correctness.  Since science, itself, is an exercise in probabilistic truth; it can’t guarantee certainty.

So, what do we have?  Well, we have a skeleton found in a slab of rock one mile long with an unknown date of origin.  Matthews states that the original investigator declared the stone to be a kind of sandstone made up of a concretion of calcareous sand.  Well, so far so good. Additionally, Matthews tells us that there is a grave yard near the site of the skeleton’s excavation began at the time of Columbus’ discovery of the island in the Caribbean in 1493. Therefore, he believes this skeleton is not of Miocene age, 28 million to 5 million years old, but of a recent date, possibly in the 15^th century.

Now, this skeleton may indeed be a 15^th century skeleton.  However, it is not proven to be so.  It still could be of a much older age even of 28 million years old.  This skeleton’s age may not be “discredited” at all because of the probabilistic nature of science and the fact that a modern age has not been proven either.  To properly determine its age one would have to examine the geology of the matrix surrounding the skeleton, examine the skeleton, itself, and properly study the geology of the island of Guadeloupe.  To the best my knowledge, none of these things have been done.  So, there is a real lack of evidence on the side of traditional “mainline” archaeology to support a claim of a recent, 15^th century, age for this skeleton.

Now, can we find any other evidence to support a claim of an older age?  Yes!  First, the skeleton was imbedded in rock.  This is a process that takes some time.  Second, we can consider a new technique, one that I have pioneered, that is the use of plate tectonics – the movement of the continental plates.

If we do this we arrive at an unexpected surprise.  Guadeloupe, as with all the islands of the West Indies rest on the Caribbean plate and neither on the North America nor South American plates.  This means if we extend the location of Guadeloupe backward in time we find that at the end of the Cretaceous Period, 66 million years ago, it was located south to southwest of the Yucatan.  With the meteorite impact that killed the dinosaurs, a huge tidal wave of 1100 feet in height flooded all of Mexico and the surrounding area and could have carried bodies of individuals to Guadeloupe.  A closer look at the eastern side of the island shows an indentation that could have been caused by this tidal wave. Of course additional geological research is needed to confirm this.

So, we claim that the skeleton has not been discredited until further research is done.  Furthermore, the fact of the Caribbean plate movements due place Guadeloupe much closer to the Yucatan opens the door to the possibility that the skeleton maybe not 28 million years old but 66 million years old.  The question is still open.

NOW WHAT?

We have been writing this blog since August of 2013 and have a total of almost 50 posts. Our work has demonstrated the reality of ancient non-human intelligent life on Earth almost one billion years ago. So, now what?  What do we do now? Do we just keep posting more short essays on dating various artifacts to extreme antiquity or discussing recent scientific discoveries over the past fifty years that support our work?

Science is a process of constant discovery.  It is most unfortunate that mainline scientists have either forgotten this or have just sold out to “the establishment view”. They know that they are guilty of this and they keep silent and continue. Shame on them.

How does real science work? Here is an example.  What if you find an apple, a nice red apple, and want to describe the general characteristics of apples? How would go about it?  Well, you would make sure you examined other apples to make certain that you had enough data to generalize their characteristics.  If in the process you find additional apples that are yellow, and of different sizes, say 6 ounces to one pound, your generalized characteristics, or theory, would classify and describe apples of being red to yellow in color, weighting 6 to 16 ounces, and you may add even their flavor of tart to sweet.  So, now we have a kind of scientific theory of apples.

This may survive for maybe 100 years until you discover something new. Something unknown before.  You now find a “green” apple. What do you do? You have to change your theory.  However, if funding or career issues are in the mix, you may not be able to change anything.  It becomes even worse if vested international “scientific” associations are involved in making the changes.  Now, you may have to wait many years for any change and any attempt by you to tell the truth would be criticized until that international group made the change.

This is even worse in business or government research. Remember Nikola Tesla? He developed a DC motor for Thomas Edison and then went on to develop the AC generator.  Edison had invested heavily in DC power generation and Tesla invents AC that threatens the DC power business.  Now, what about government sponsored research?  Matters only become far worse.

Archaeology is often government funded. Just how is a new thinker, with a new approach, going to get accepted?  He won’t.  Oh! My critics will argue that all one need to do is get published in a peer reviewed journal and at some point the new research will be accepted.  Really?! Keep in mind that the “establishment” is doing the peer review.  Consider Alfred Wagoner the developer of the theory of Continental Drift. He wrote his book in the 1920’s and was rejected until sea floor spreading was discovered in the 1960’s.

Another individual was Luis Alvarez who discovered the soot layer at the KT boundary and suggested that the Earth was struck by a meteorite and that led to the death of the dinosaurs.  He was discounted until the discovery of the impact crater off the coast of the Yucatan. This is the reality of scientific research and one should not dismiss new knowledge just because the mainline scientific community has not yet accepted it.

Think for yourselves. Look over various artifacts and fossils and ask yourself if the claims of mainline science are correct. There are many writers doing this but because they are dealing with science they are very unwilling to challenge the establishment.  However, science will not progress until old ideas are challenged and replace with new and better understanding of what the universe is all about.

So, now what?  Now, this author will keep on pursuing the truth.  In geology today plate tectonics is currently replacing much of the old view.  In archaeology, it has become necessary to find a way to integrate this knowledge into the study of the ancient past.  Archaeology simply cannot assume that all intelligent life and civilization is a product of Homo sapiens-modern people.  Neither can they just assume that North and South America are the New World.  My research has demonstrated that they are not.

So, now what? Think for yourselves and keep pursuing the truth. Challenge the old theories and push the boundaries of scientific knowledge.  Study and learn and join me in this research to study the past, what we call “Paleo-Earth”. Also, feel free to email us with your comments at black2tell@yahoo.com.

What is a Billion Years More or Less?

What if time were infinite in both directions, past and future?  Think about this for a minute.  What we have is eternity and that would be necessary for the universe to exist. This challenges the Big Bang Theory of the origin of the universe and puts us at odds with mainline academic science.

The Electric Theory of the universe allows for eternity.  This means that there is really no way to determine the age of the universe.  Now reconsider my research that indicates that intelligent life has existed on our world for upwards of one billion years.  Ask yourself: “What is a billion years compared to eternity?”  The answer would: “Not very much”.  That is the point. A billion years compared to eternity is meaningless. So, a billion year old civilization on earth is not an extreme idea and should not be rejected out of hand.

Some may argue that there is no proof for the Electric Theory of the universe. However, there is really no proof for the Big Bang Theory either.  Although both theories have experimental support, neither can be considered proven, at least not in the sense that mathematical theorems are proven.

Another way to consider this is that the universe is the sum total of all possible outcomes for the given inputs at the specific time of the observation (today, yesterday, tomorrow).  Evolution can be viewed in this way also.  It is not so much that life forms evolve but that as time passes the various conditions (inputs) change so life is forced to change.  Although we view this change as evolution it is actually the result of the process of the constant change in the universe.

Applying this to the Earth, we find our planet existing in a dynamic solar system, one that like the universe changes with time.  As change occurs, the Earth must also change and so too does life.  So, what we have with intelligent life, is what is possible at the “time” of its existence. Even if the solar system is only 5 billion years old and the universe 14 billion years old this would still be the case.

Now, our research has come across the artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 that show cone headed beings and inter-planetary space travel.  Such an artifact provides substantiation for an ancient intelligent society of non-humans existing at the time of Rodinia, i.e. 900-750 million years ago.  This argues that intelligent life on our world is the result of various inputs that made such life possible at that time.  In fact, it indicates that our solar system may have be capable of harboring intelligent life from an extremely early epoch.

Although we do not know how or why this is possible, it seems to be the case.  Furthermore, there seems to be evidence that the solar system underwent significant changes and wide-spread destruction and that life re-established itself.

There is the possibility that archaeology may have discovered proof, or at least evidence for this. Specifically, Teotihuacan may offer this evidence.  Peter Tompkins in his book “Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids” discusses the theory that the site lay-out of this city may have been modeled after the solar system and the location of various structures indicate the location of the planets in the solar system with an error of 2 per cent. What if this was not an error but actually indicated the relative positions of the planets at the time of the construction of the city.  We have calculated that this city is 70 million years old.  A 2 per cent change in 70 million years may seem insignificant, however, if this change accumulates at a regular rate, we would have a change in planet positions of almost 22 per cent 750 million years ago. This was the time that Rodinia broke apart.  Rogue planets would also be possible.

This presents us with the possibility that the ancients built Teotihuacan as an absolute reference marker for future generations so they would have access to their scientific knowledge to restore civilization in the event it was destroyed.

Mainline science currently knows that life was destroyed on our planet many times in various mass extinctions.  Now, it seems that there is a real possibility that intelligent life was also destroyed and managed to re-established itself.  We are the intelligent beings that have re-established intelligent life after the destructions of these ancients.  We do not know who or what they were or where the originated from, never-the-less, we are here and must study these ancients.