Earth’s Lost Colony of Mars: Did William Niven Prove the Existence of A 66 Million Year Old City in Mexico?

In 1926, William Niven, discovered ruins 31 feet below the surface of a city destroyed by a massive earthquake.  The earthquake was so powerful that it smashed and crushed buildings made of stone and concrete. The buildings were totally shattered.

Additionally, these ruins were covered with volcanic ash 2 to 3 feet thick. This ash was then covered with 31 feet of sand, gravel, and boulders and two other buried city pavements indicating that the ruined city was submerged by a massive tidal wave.

The actual dig was over 31 feet below the surface.  There was a layer of soil one foot deep, then, another layer of gravel and sand with broken pottery nine feet deep and a street pavement below that.  Below the pavement there was another layer of small boulders and gravel and sand six feet deep followed by a second street pavement. Below this second pavement there was found an additional fourteen feet of small boulders, gravel, and sand followed by two to three feet of ash.  Below the ash there was a buried city and a third pavement.  The age of this city has yet to be determined. (See either The Lost Continent of Mu by James Churchward or The Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids by Peter Tompkins)

How can this happen?  The site of the discovery is in the Valley of Mexico located 7,000 feet above sea level. Furthermore, this valley is surrounded with mountains that rise an additional 5,000 feet.  For a tidal wave to strike here would require that the site be lower, closer to sea level. Just when did this happen? Was it, 10,000 years, or 50,000 years, or a million years?

The uplifting of mountain ranges occur when land masses are subducted (slide under) another land mass, in this case the Valley of Mexico uplifting both the valley plateau and the mountain ranges. This is a slow process.  Tens of millions of years would be required.

However, William Niven’s description of the site gives a clue to the date of this city’s destruction. The massive earthquake, followed by thick ash, followed by a tidal wave is characteristic of what would have occurred when the meteorite struck the Yucatan coast and killed off the dinosaurs some 66 million years ago. I know, archaeologists will object; however, the description of the site never-the- less fits with the result of such an impact.

There is more. William Niven, conducted his research at a number of clay pits in the Valley of Mexico about 6 miles from Mexico City. The area he examined was 20 miles in length by 10 miles in width.  That is 200 square miles.  The destroyed city was very large, possibly inhabited by millions of individuals. Keep in mind that New York City is only 305 square miles and has a population of over 8 million people.

William Niven’s work has been neglected, mostly because he provided it to James Churchward the author of the book, The Lost Continent of Mu. Unlike Churchward, Niven was a better scientist and his work needs to be re-studied.

We now face a quandary.  Just who were the residents of this lost city?  There are some who believe that there is a connection between Mexico and an extinct civilization on Mars.  If this is the case, then, the connection seems to have taken place during the Cretaceous Period, the time of the dinosaurs. I have dated La Venta, the Olmec city, at 103.8 million years of age.

If a connection did exist with Mars, then, this city may have been a colony of Mars. If this is the case, then, we can also ask: “Is Mars the lost continent of Mu”?

Posted in Alien Civilization on MarsMars, ancient civilization, DINOSAURS, Lost Cities of Mexico, Mars, UFOs, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ring of the Gods

In 2013 I began a blog under the pen name of “Mr. Black”.  In it I posted a variety of essays dealing with lost civilizations, the great antiquity of intelligent life on Earth, the errors of current archaeology, and the bias in academic scientific studies.  Additionally, I added posts on Extra-terrestrials and the Mars and Maya connection.  Yes, the mainline academic community objected and I equally objected to them.

Every new concept, theory, or methodology will face resistance and even hostility by the establishment. That is because it is a challenge to the understanding and accepted methods of the given discipline. It also threatens the leaders or “greats” of that discipline as-well-as risks funding sources.  You see, pure science is not pure because it is composed of people and of course people are not pure.

That said, we can continue and tell you why you should read this blog and why it is correct- at least in its overview- and why it provides answers to questions that the mainline academic disciplines can’t and never will be able to answer.

Why should you read this blog? You should read this blog because it gives answers to the anomalies and mysteries in archaeology. Let me tell you a story.  When I was in college I began to study evolution because I wanted to know how people originated.  I started with all the in vogue scientific literature.  However, as I got older, I began to consider archaeology and in particular examine ancient Egypt.  I would look and look at the photos of all the tombs, pyramids, statues, and art from ancient Egypt.  The issue was that the more I looked and studied the less what I saw was anything like what the scientific establishment was saying about the past.  It was different – very different.

So, I began reading the non-scientific literature.  The result was the same.  What I saw was different – very different.  If I wanted answers, real answers, I would have to approach my research with an open mind, without pre-conceived ideas, and follow the results where they led me.

In 2009, I looked for a starting point for my research and found it in the study of Harappa, in the Indus Valley.  Some of the non-traditional literature I read suggested that Harappa was destroyed in an atomic war.  This was so because at the lowest level of excavation of this site there were many unburied bodies, burnt buildings, and high levels of radioactivity.  To the best of my knowledge these findings are still unexplained.

What I did next was to ask myself a “what if question”.  I asked, “What if a meteor or comet had entered the Earth’s atmosphere and exploded high above ground and deposited a great deal of radioactive residue, like a dirty bomb, over the city?”  Then, I reasoned that there should also be other traces of this meteor or comet in the form of impact craters around the world indicating its path of flight.

So, I got on the internet, called up and looked up impact craters. What I saw was a distribution of crater sites.  I then tried to “fit a curve” – a line through the distribution.  It seemed to work so I continued with some rough and ready mathematics.  I divided the crater map into sections each with 30 degrees of longitude and averaged the latitude and longitude of the craters in that section and got a point. When I completed the arithmetic I found that I had a series of points that indicated a direction from Southeast to Northwest.

I didn’t know what this line was.  It pointed to a direction that led to the Great Lakes in the Northeast and to Tahiti in the Pacific Ocean.  It seemed like a trajectory but the dates for the impacts were widely separated. Some were a billion years old, others were several hundred million years old, and some were only several hundred thousand years old.  If this line was a trajectory, then, it had to be an orbit of a celestial body of some kind that circled the Earth for a very long time.  Since the celestial body no longer existed, it obviously became extinct by gradually breaking up and falling to Earth.

My conclusion was that it was an ancient moon of Earth that orbited too close to our planet and then broke apart. I called it Luna Prime.  However, I realized that it could also be another type of object, a massive debris field that also fell to Earth. In any case, this orbital line could be used with the plate movement of the continents to date ancient archaeological sites.

My theory, actually my hypothesis, was that the ancients worshiped the stars and planets and if this object was in the sky they would include it as part of their pantheon.  This would mean that they would build their temples under the orbit of this object and could even use it to create a calendar.

Also, since the continental plates moved and their speed and direction of movement were known to science, I could use the distance from any geographic location as a way to date the age of that temple or archaeological site.  All I do was divide the distance by the speed of movement to get a date.  Now, to try it and test my hypothesis.

In 2013, there were two reports.  The first stated that an underwater pyramid had been found in the Azores and the second stated that a comet had struck ancient Egypt 28.5 million years ago. Now, for the test. What I did was simply assume that my line was the trajectory of the comet and then date the pyramid.  When I adjusted the map of the Azores for where they were 28.5 million years ago, these islands fell under the orbital line.  Furthermore, I discovered the El Amarna, the Egyptian city of Pharaoh Akhenaten, came under the orbital line.  My test seemed to work.  I dated an Egyptian site to an extremely ancient date, 28.5 million years ago.

So, I continued dating using this method.  I found that Egypt was home to very ancient civilizations with the oldest nearest the coast at 46 million years and the youngest, the present time, in southern Egypt.

Additionally, I continued dating only this time in North America.  Since the orbital line extended to the Great Lakes, I connected this point to the Southern point at Tahiti. This made both Sault Saint Marie on the US/ Canadian border and Tahiti in the South Pacific turn around points for the celestial orbit I discovered.

What I did was examine a map of North America at the time of the impact that killed the dinosaurs. What I found was that the orbital line crossed the Yucatan over the Chicxulub Crater, the meteorite impact that killed the dinosaurs.  The orbit also cross over two sites, Chichen Itza and Tulum, indicating that these sites were deliberately constructed under this orbit. Lastly, the Yucatan was facing East at this time, 66 million years ago.

The fact that these five things things came together, was a statistical impossibility unless intelligent design was responsible and I concluded that there existed a civilization in the Yucatan during the Cretaceous, the time of the dinosaurs.

So, my hypothesis was working and I was dating civilization to very remote times in the past.  However, I wanted to know how my research fitted established scientific knowledge.  I discovered that the current understanding of Lunar formation was that the Earth was struck, with a glancing blow in the Northern Hemisphere, over 4 billion years ago by a Mars sized object and the ejecta formed the moon. Also, in addition to the moon, the Earth became surrounded by a massive debris field.  This meant that my research fitted current scientific research and was not rejected out of hand.  I was correct, at least in the overview.

Now, what else came out of this work?  If I am correct, then, my research should explain a whole host of anomalies in fields as diverse as geology and the geo-sciences, anthropology, paleontology, philology, and even the origin of religion and mythology.

I know, I know, it is hard to accept, but that is exactly what a correct solution or theory will do. This is especially true for the kind of research that I have done because it identifies what is fundamental and builds from there.  You see, true knowledge is top down not bottom up.  The specific is a result of the general theory.  That is why it explains so much.

Let me give you an example.  My work identified an orbital path or trajectory of a celestial object around the Earth.  If this path is correct, then it should explain other things about the Earth.  Well, my orbital path did exactly that.  You see, when I applied it to the movement of the North American plate, it position itself over the Chicxulub Crater off the Yucatan coast.  This is the crater caused by the impact that killed the dinosaurs.  This meant that the Chicxulub meteorite orbited on the path until it crashed to Earth.  This was unexpected.

Furthermore, current geo-scientists are claiming that the continents may have originated in a crescent pattern about the Earth. This pattern seems to be the same as my orbital path. Now, I still need to verify this, but if it is correct it is telling us that the continents, themselves, may have fallen to Earth from space along this orbit.  WHAT?  That is what I said.  “What and how could this be?”

Here is how and why.  Again, the newest theory of how our moon was formed states that a Mars sized object struck the Earth at a glancing angle in the northern hemisphere and the ejecta formed the moon.  Well, it seems that my orbital line is the path of this ejecta, at least that ejecta that caused a massive debris field around the Earth and gradually fell back over a period of some four billion years.  In short, my orbital path supports the theory of lunar formation with a collision between Earth and a Mars sized object over four billion years ago.  I told you I was correct.

It also seems that the remaining debris ring fell to earth at the end of the last ice age. At that time North America was blanketed with glaciers three miles thick. How do you break up these glaciers? They are broken up by rocks from space crashing down on the Earth. Again, my theory about an orbital ring around the Earth provides yet another answer and explains the reason for the end of the last Ice Age. The general theory explains the specific results. My work is correct and the Earth was inhabited by intelligent beings for a very long time, upwards of one billion years and maybe longer.

Now, there is one more question to answer.  Why did I call this essay “Ring of the Gods”? Well, what do you think an orbital debris field is? It’s a ring around the Earth. Furthermore, depending from where on the surface you are observing from, it could look like a serpent or a staircase or even a roadway to heaven. As for the Gods, well, they are the ancient inhabitants of Earth who lived before us.  Exactly what they were is unknown.

Posted in Alien Civilization on MarsMars, ancient civilization, Ancient Egypt, geological dating, Lost Cities of Mexico, Mars, Mexico, North America, Origin of the Moon, scientific theories, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ET and the Origin of Human Civilization

I was invited onto a talk radio show last week and was asked if I believed that ET (extraterrestrials) interfered in human evolution or civilization.  This is a difficult question to answer because my research can answer this question either way, yes or no.  What I said was “No, but my research indicates intelligent civilization on the Earth 100 million years ago”.

To say my answer was strange is an understatement. If someone said this to me I would think he or she was straddling both sides of the issue.  Well, I assure you that I am not and will attempt to clarify my position.

My research indicates that civilization existed in the extremely remote past on the Earth.  In Mexico alone, there seems to have been a civilization over 100 million years ago.  Specifically, Monte Alban can be dated to 95 million years of age and La Vent to over 103 million years of age.

Now, since the scientific establishment believe that humans are no more than two hundred thousand years old, such an old civilization cannot be human.  So, what was it?  To say ET established it on the Earth seems to be a reasonable conclusion or is it?  Let’s examine the issue a little more closely.

Current belief is that humans originated from an ape like ancestor.  If this is true, then, from what did this ape like ancestor originate from?  We can proceed with this approach until we arrive at the origin of life itself.  What we have is a continuum of life that evolved into other forms throughout the Earth’s history. In fact, evolution requires a development from one species to another.  This means that the immediate ancestor to modern humans was very similar to us but somehow different.  That difference would be difficult if not impossible for current archaeological and paleontological methods to determine.

Small differences between species are not measurable by current research methods. What is left is the lumping of everything together into an extremely short period (6,000 years for civilization) and dismissing any research that contradicts this position.  This is today’s scientific position with a few exceptions. This, then, results in the belief that a very old civilization must have been somehow resulted from ET.

However, if a different form of intelligent life existed on the Earth 100 million or more years ago, then, it would be possible for that civilization to have been very advanced and even, itself, developed space flight. Now, it becomes possible for a civilization in the Earth’s ancient past to have developed space flight technology and to have visited other worlds in our solar system.  If the time scale is long enough, then, it becomes possible for this terrestrial civilization to have colonized other worlds and to visit their home world (Earth) after various world-wide catastrophes. This is what I believe happened.

Furthermore, in addition to a 100 million year old civilization on the Earth, I believe that there existed a very advanced civilization on the Earth during the time of the continent of Rodinia from 900 to 750 million years ago.  This civilization developed space flight and colonized other planets in our solar system.

Dr. John Brandenburg, believes that the planet Mars harbors and extinct civilization that was destroyed by nuclear war. If he is correct, then, it is my opinion that that civilization was a colony of the Earth mostly likely begun by this ancient civilization from Rodinia.

Beyond this point, I cannot speak to the issue of ET since I have a lack of data on the subject.

Posted in Alien Civilization on MarsMars, ancient civilization, geological dating, Lost Cities of Mexico, Mexico, Monte Alban, North America, Rodinia, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Monument Valley a 35 Million Year Old Landmark?

The United States has many stunning landscapes, particularly in the Southwest part of the country. One of these is the breathtaking Monument Valley on the Navajo Reservation in Arizona and Utah.  Amid the Mars like landscape rise five distinct buttes high into the blue desert sky.  The coordinates for this site is 36 59’ N and 110 6’ W.

As magnificent as this site is my research has offered a glimmer of even greater significance for this wonder.  This site, particularly these high rising buttes, may have been carved by an unknown intelligence millions of years ago.  So, here in the American Southwest, rest five immense towers that may be the legacy of a very ancient and unknown intelligent civilization.

Seeking answers to the unexplained and anomalous leads us into very strange areas of research and often amazing discoveries. That is because they are not what we expect and tell us that what we think we know, what we believe to be scientific truth, is not the case.  We are required to change our world view, our understanding and explanation for the world we find ourselves in. Now, let us begin our voyage of discovery.

Those of you who know of my work know that I claimed to have discovered an orbit around earth of what I believe to be either a lost moon I call Luna Prime or a massive debris field. By plotting this orbit on a map of any continent we get a reference line.  If we measure the distance from this line to any geographic point and divide by the rate at which the continent moves we get a time estimate of when that geographic point was on that line.  In this case, since the line is an orbital path, the date is when any particular geographic location was under that orbit.

Over the United States, the orbit extends northwest from the Atlantic coast to the northern end of Lake Michigan where it turns to the southwest toward Arizona.  Now, it is my conclusion that the ancients built massive monuments as geodetic markers to act as reference points for maps and even time references. Some of these markers may have even plotted the position of stars.  So, carving out a massive geodetic marker from rock at this location would put it under the orbit and would act as calendar reference point.

It is the location of Monument Valley under the path of this celestial orbital body that leads me to believe that this site may be such a geodetic marker and artificially carved by intelligent beings.  There are also other factors that support my, let us call it a scientific guess.

The rock strata is odd.  At base there is Organ Rock Shale red to red brown in color. Next, de chelly Sandstone. This sandstone is not water deposited but wind deposited. Next, we have early Triassic sandstone followed by a cap rock of Shinarump Conglomerate sandstone deposited by slow meandering rivers. This cap rock is very hard, cementing, and very resistant to erosion. It is the perfect material to use to protect the buttes vertical cliffs. It just the kind of rock someone would deliberately select to protect these monuments.

Although one can argue that nothing that I have written proves that these monuments are carved; the location of these buttes under orbital path of Luna Prime and the rock strata with the Shinarump Conglomerate cap rock are highly suggestive of intelligent design.

Oh! How old are these artificially carved monuments?  Well, I haven’t yet completed the calculations but an age of 35 million years may be likely.  There is one more possibility.  Given the resemblance of the American Southwest to Mars, maybe, just maybe, an extinct civilization from Mars may have been responsible for these magnificent monuments.

Posted in Alien Civilization on MarsMars, ancient civilization, Mars, North America, scientific theories, UFOs, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Did Humans Evolve from Dinosaurs?

“Mommy where did I come from?”  This is a familiar question of young children.  Now imagine hearing this answer given by a parent. “Well, we all came from dinosaurs a very, very long time ago.” This is not so far-fetched. There is a real possibility that we may have descended from dinosaurs, or more properly, had a common ancestor with a type of dinosaur called Fabrosaurus.

Fabrosaurus or “Fabre’s Lizard” is named after Jean Henri Fabre, a French entomologist.  This dinosaur is believed to be a small, 3-foot tall plant eater. An incomplete lower right jaw of this dinosaur was found in South Africa in Triassic sediments.  (ref. pg. 143 The New Illustrated Dinosaur Dictionary by Helen Roney Sattler, copyrighted 1983 & 1990. Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Books. New York, NY.)

I can hear your complaints now. “Oh! Mr. Black, you have gone too far.  We all know that humans had an ape like ancestor.  What do you mean by making such an outrageous statement?  You need proof and lots of research to back up a statement like that. You just must not make such a claim.”

You know, if I read a claim like mine written by someone else, I would think the same thing.  It is just that, my research has given me a different understanding of the ancient past and human evolution as-well-as.

So, just how do I reach this conclusion?  Well, it’s actually a guess and not a conclusion or theory in a scientific sense. However, it is based on some evidence, controversial evidence I agree, but evidence never-the-less.

This evidence is the 2012 release of artifacts by the Mexican Government depicting cone-headed individuals.  Furthermore, these artifacts also have engravings of what seem to be  cone-headed beings undertaking interplanetary space flight.  I told you the evidence was controversial.

Let us continue.  The engraved images also show hands that look like those of a Fabrosaurus (Ibid pg. 159).  You may think that this evidence is thin in the extreme, well it is.  I admit this. It is just that my research indicates that a highly developed civilization existed on Earth upwards of 864 million years ago.  So, what kind of beings could have existed that far back in the past?  In fact, dinosaurs are too recent and a pre-dinosaur ancestor is required as an ancestor to the human line.

This is not all. The issue with dinosaurs is that they are considered to be either reptiles or warm blooded  bird like animals.  Even so, there is a problem.  Human have “live births” and do not lay eggs.  So, where is the connection to dinosaurs or other such ancestor?  The answer is in two parts.  First, is the ICA stones.  They are a highly controversial artifacts, claimed to be hoaxed. Second, the Brachiosaurus a very massive plant eater.  Why this particular dinosaur?  The answer is that the ICA stones have engraved images of the Brachiosaurus having live births and nursing their young like modern cows do today.  They seem to be mammals or pre-mammals. Since humans had to come from something, some type of dinosaur or pre-dinosaur animal had to be the source.  So, as they say in the United States, “the hits just keep coming”.

Posted in ancient civilization, DINOSAURS, Human Origins, Mexico, scientific theories, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Theia and the Origin of the Moon and Earth’s Extinct Debris Field

Sometimes an idea is so distant from our current understanding that it seems fantasy and not fact.  Coupled to this a lack of mathematical understanding and the new idea is even more impenetrable.  Even so, the new idea or hypothesis can be correct.   So, how can we judge if it is correct or not?  Let us consider new scientific research and see if the new idea or hypothesis fits.

The new research we can consider is the new hypothesis on the origin of the moon. This research is called the Big Splat of Lunar Origin.  Briefly, it proposes that a planetary body the size of Mars struck the earth at a glancing angle resulting in both a massive debris field and the moon.  The impactor is called Theia.

Why is this important?  Well, we have claimed that we have discovered an orbital path about the earth of either a lost moon or a debris field.  We use this path together with plate tectonic movement to date lost civilizations.  Well, the test we have to make is to determine how can there have been an orbital debris field or moon in the Earth’s past and what mechanism could have caused it.  Or, in other words, is our hypothesis of an orbital path possible?  The answer is yes because the impact with Theia supplies the mechanism that resulted in the formation of such a debris field.

Furthermore, the strange orbital path we have hypothesized is consistent with Theia’s impact.  We believe that the Earth was struck in the Northern Hemisphere at the latitude and longitude of the Great Lakes.

So, our hypothesis, found independently of any reference to the Big Splat Theory, is not rejected by current scientific research.  In fact, it agrees with it, strongly arguing that our work is scientifically sound. If we were incorrect, we would not have this correlation to this lunar impact theory.

The unfathomable aspect of our work exists simply because most people were schooled at a time when this new scientific work had not be done or was not included in their curriculum.  This is another support for our work and demonstrates that it is not only possible but new and unique as-well.

Posted in Origin of the Moon, scientific theories, Theia | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Blythe Intaglios, America’s Nazca lines, could be 50,000 Years Old!

Guess what? We may have found the answers to some of the questions about the Blythe Intaglios (incised designs) discovered by US Army Air Corp pilot George A. Palmer in 1931. (See for a full discussion)

What are these intaglios?  They are large geoglyphs in the desert floor outside Blythe, California in the United States that are best seen from the air. One, the giant, is very large – 167 feet long.

In addition to questions about their large size and how they were made, there are questions as to why were they place so that they can be best viewed only from the sky, why were they made to begin with, and why were they located in the desert of Blythe, California in the United States. We believe that we have discovered the answer to some of these questions.

The Blythe Intaglios were place under the path of flight of an orbital celestial object of earth that no longer exists.  The celestial object could have been either a massive debris field or moon or even some combination of both.  A debris field can coalesce into a moon or a moon can break apart into a debris field by action of the earth’s gravity.  The exact nature of this celestial object is not yet known but this author believes that it was most likely a massive debris field made up of very large blocks of rock.

Well, the orbit of this celestial anomaly, passes over the Blythe Intaglios.  In fact, one can extend the orbit to include the Meteor Crater in Arizona.  This crater was caused by an impact 50,000 years ago.  The orbit also extends northeast toward the Great Lakes where it turns southeast toward Africa.  We discovered this orbit accidently back in the summer of 2009 and have used it as a reference line in conjunction with the plate tectonic movement of the continents to date various archaeological sites. (See our book: Secrets of Lost Earth.)

It is known that the ancients worshipped celestial objects and we believe that this object was also an object of worship.  It also acted as a celestial reference point for locating places on the ground i.e. for fishing, hunting, etc.

Given the location of these Intaglios in the desert outside Blythe, we believe that they could date from the time of the Meteor Crater impact some 50,000 years ago. Dating these intaglios is very difficult.  Dates of from 900 years to 2,000 years ago have be suggested but not confirmed.

Posted in ancient civilization, ARTIFACTS, geological dating, North America | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment